High Court Declares Load Shedding Unconstitutional: Numsa’s Response

Landmark Judgment in Energy Crisis: South Africa’s enduring power struggles take a new turn as the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) celebrates a significant legal victory. The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has ruled load shedding unconstitutional, calling it a breach of basic human rights.

Numsa’s Stance:

  • Victory for the Masses: Numsa spokesperson Phakamile Majola heralds this ruling as a triumph for “the working class and the poor of our country.”
  • Government’s Directive: The court orders Electricity Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa to safeguard critical state services from the impacts of load shedding.

Majola’s Demands:

  • Immediate Government Action: Majola urges the government to comply with the court’s decision to halt deliberate power cuts.
  • Shift in Energy Policy: Numsa calls for re-investment in coal and maintenance of coal-fired power stations, alongside restarting mothballed power facilities.
  • Renewable Energy Criticism: Majola criticizes the current Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers (REIPP’s) for being costly and unreliable.

Broader Implications:

  • Against ANC Policies: Majola attributes the power crisis to the ANC government’s implementation of a ‘fake Just Energy Transition’.
  • Demand for Public Consultation: Numsa seeks an inclusive dialogue with all societal segments to determine a suitable energy mix for the nation.

Government’s Position:

  • Acknowledging the Ruling: The Presidency acknowledges the judgment, indicating that it is currently reviewing the decision and will announce further actions in due time.
Also Read:   Why Load Shedding in South Africa is the Defining Issue of Our Time

This ruling marks a pivotal moment in South Africa’s energy sector, potentially reshaping the nation’s approach to power generation and distribution amidst ongoing load shedding challenges.

AI was used to generate part or all of this content - more information